Saturday, September 10, 2016

AElfwyn Knighting Poem

To Mark the Elevation of AElfwyn Laganwuda into the Order of Chivalry
By THLaird Colyne Stewart, Sep AS 51 (2016)

Attend upon AElfwyn || axe-handed warrior
Woman of wolf-blood || winner of wars
Boar-branded carl || oft battled for high crown
Brought honour bright-handed || to kingdom and king
On hide-cloak or hilltop || at home or on far field
Faced she all foemen || who dared face her blade
For king she knelt truly || and bore his ring keenly
Like Beowulf boldly || battle-light taking
Gathered much mind-worth || which gladly she bore
Now earls erupt shouting || as high-king advances
Yell boldly her brave deeds || while beating on shields
Gracious gift-giving || king bands her arm brightly
Ring-giver right names her || as Ridda and cnicht



This was written to be read when Ælfwyn came out of her vigil to hold the field in a holmgang circle, but we were running late.

Thursday, July 21, 2016

Minerva and Mars Debate Their Worth (Proelio verborum gladiisque—A Clash of Words and Swords)

By THL Roselyne de l’ Estrangere and THL Colyne Stewart
Written as part of the Medieval Debate Poetry class at War of the Trillium, July 2016 (AS 51)

I.                   Prolocutio [Prelude]

There once arose a fine debate—
The Gods of War, which was more great?
Mars, with his courage, sword and axe?
Minerva, with her greater tact?

[Enim contentio erumpit:
Quis aptior, di belli, sit?
Minerva maiore dolo,
Aut Mars virtute, gladio?]

[A debate broke out, indeed:
The gods of war, who was most fit?
Minerva, greater in guile,
Or Mars, with his courage/strength, his sword?]


            II.     Minerva

Oh, Mars, bold brother, god of war,
Who comes to hall adrape in gore,
What right claim you to sit that seat
At Father’s side, by mead and meat?
That is my place, that is my chair,
Begone, go back to battle’s lair.

         III.     Mars

Honour is mine, 'tis good and right,
By Jupiter to sit each night.
War is a sport for manly heart;
To weave, like you, is woman’s art!
It is for men to spill men’s blood;
Why has this not been understood?

         IV.     Minerva

Poor Mars, who thinks with little sword,
Believes his worth as mighty lord
Is one and all tied to his sex
And bellows while his muscles flex.
But war is more than savage skill—
There must be justice in each kill.

            V.     Mars

Justice is obvious to me—
Before my sword all cowards flee!
Why not upon my sex rely?
My rivals all are sure to die!
If you think not my view is right
Put off your toils, and let us fight!

      VI.   Conclusio [Conclusion]

So fight they did, the sparks did fly,
Till Jupiter called from the sky,
“My children, you must not compete,
For that is Juno’s promised seat.”

[Flagravit bellum, furenter,
Rex donec dixit Iupiter,
“Nolite pugnare, fili!
Sedem Junoni promisi!”]

[Battle broke out, furiously
Until King Jupiter said,
“Do not fight, (my) children!
I have promised the seat to Juno!”]

At War of the Trillium in 2016, as part of the Trillium War School, THL Colyne Stewart taught a class on medieval debate poetry. Tough various scholars have differing opinions on just what qualifies as a “true” debate poem, but for the purposes of the class a debate poem was any poem wherein two or more different points of view expounded on a topic (with two or three being the most common). The points of view in debate poetry were expressed by speakers which could be almost anything, including people, inanimate objects, personifications (of emotions, seasons, etc.), or religious figures. Sometimes a judge or judges would be invoked to settle the debate.

The class was a practical one, so the students paired up to write their poems together. As there was an uneven number of students, Roselyne was paired with Colyne.  The class decided to all write on the same subject to see how different approaches could be taken with the same theme. The subject selected was Athena debating Ares (Roselyne and Colyne decided to go with the Roman version of the gods). The class agreed to all write couplets in iambic tetrameter. Roselyne and Colyne elected to write their stanzas in six lines, with an introduction and conclusion of four lines. They also elected to invoke a judge, and decided to have the judge not agree with either of the debaters.

After the fact, Roselyne translated the prelude and conclusion into Latin which followed the poetic conventions agreed upon as well as a new literal translation back into English.


Sunday, May 29, 2016

From the Flames Forged

By THLaird Colyne Stewart, May AS 51 (2016)

For Their Highnesses Ealdormere, Siegfried and Xristinia, and in memory of a very hot Crown Tournament in Bastille du Lac.

The shire’s sun seared hot the flesh
Of those who came to fight that day
Hadean heat burned through the mesh
Of gallery and tents so gay.
The warriors, stout fighters all,
In horrid heat contested well,
But one by one they topple fall,
Into the brittle grassy hell.
The heat—damn heat—of Vulcan’s forge,
Which caused them all to cook and steam,
And raised their stomachs in their gorge,
It stood between them and their dream.
But one, a phoenix, born of fire,
From molten heat arises new,
Alone upon that field so dire,
A-drape in jupon sodden blue.
In sun burned hand he takes the crown,
And gifts it to the woman who
Now kneeling on the earth burned brown
Inspired him to battle through.


Friday, April 29, 2016

The Partimen of Rhodri ap Hywel and Colyne Stewart

By Master Rhodri ap Hywel of Calontir and THLaird Colyne Stewart of Ealdormere, March AS 50 (2016)

Introduction

As part of my goal (this is Colyne speaking) of writing fifty poems during Anno Societatis 50, I decided I wanted to write a partimen. The partimen was a genre of Occitan and Old French lyric poetry composed between two troubadours. It is a subgenre of the tenso or cobla (a poetic debate). I reached out to see if anyone else was interested in taking part in the partimen and Master Rhodri of Calontir eagerly accepted.

The first speaker in the partimen presents a problem with two solutions and leaves his opponent to choose which solution to defend and then takes up the second option themselves. Therefore the debate is not based on conviction but simply for the sake of discussion. However, this distinction does not appear to have been seen in period, with troubadours and trouvères using both interchangeably. One of the most common themes in partimen was courtly love. Each speaker (sometimes the same poet, sometimes two different poets) contribute three stanzas and an envoi in which he appeals to someone to be his judge. In some poems the two participants appeal to the same person, but more often each participant chose their own judge.

Since Rhodri is from Calontir, and I am from Ealdormere, and both of our kingdoms share strong bonds of friendship, I decided to pose a dilemma in which I felt sure we’d both have opinions. Namely,which animal is more noble, the falcon or the wolf? (The falcon being the totemic beast of Calontir, while the wolf serves Ealdormere as the same).

The form of the poem was set as tercets (groups of three lines rhyming aab) written in trochaic trimeter (lines of three metrical feet switching between stressed and unstressed syllables). I chose this form as I do not usually write in trochaic meter so felt it would be more of a challenge.

The Partimen

Colyne
There the strong beasts abound
Round the woods they fierce found
But which most noble be?
Wolf of fang and claw red
From whom all foes have fled
King of forest’s great tree?
Or be it the bold bird
Falcon feathery furred
God of blue sky made free?
This our dilemma be
Answer this is our plea
So ask I friend Rhodri.

Rhodri
Like days of winter’s end
Come words from Colyne friend.
Wisdom he seeks from me.
Joyfully I reply
My answer not denied
So this I now decree:
The wolf is strong indeed
Shall none say I mislead,
But in this he lesser be.
He watches falcons fly
Above his howling cry;
His wish to be so free.
But, like all falcon’s prey
Must watch until the day
When suffers falcon’s glee,
And the storm-cleaver strikes
With claws like soldier’s pikes
Then even wolf must flee.
So this claim I is true
But to friend Bryce I sue
Judge these words I do plea

Colyne
Reply I must and will
Through paper ink and quill
To words by friend Rhodri.
Falcon lord, Wolfen king,
Which is best, Which takes ring?
Answer is lupine, thee
Must if are honest men
Take his side, only then
Will all of us agree:
For soaring bird on wing
Target is, for bow string,
Plummets down into tree,
While the grey wolf will stalk
Those who slew purple hawk
And with teeth sharp and free
Tear out the hunter’s throat
Rend his maille and surcoat
Pay no heed to his plea.
I claim this to be true
Frederick, master, you
Judge our words, blessed be.


The Judgment

As our judges Rhodri chose Master Bryce de Byram of Atlantia and I choose Master Fridrikr Tomassen of AEthlemearc (though he is referred to by an Anglicization of his name in the poem). Both judges elected to render their verdicts in verse. Master Fridrikr was the first to reply:

You call on me to stand and speaking true
an answer to your pleadings give to you
And now I say, good fellows never fear
for Rhodri stands and calls forth bravest hawk
Whilst Colyne enters with lupine friend to talk
and neither makes the answer sky-blue clear
Come gentle foes, who friends at end must be
and hear this Master, for whom the words direct
are hard, who speaks in kennings using their effect
to form the verse to make the hearer see.
My love for Ealdor Crown must hold and sway
And thus I claim that Colyne takes the day.


We still await Master Bryce’s verdict, and I will post it once it is received.

Tuesday, April 12, 2016

The Muses

By THLaird Colyne Stewart, April AS 50 (2016)

Urania is to me a mystery,
As is Terpsichore her sister fair,
Polyhymenia does not to me
Deign speak, but Clio has me in her snare.
Both Calliope and Thalia share
My love, as does Erato and her harp,
In Euterpe’s embrace I find some care,
While Melpomene’s teeth are long and sharp.


Written as a  huitain (pronounced wit-tain) which ws a 15th century 8-line strophe with 8-syllable lines (French) or 10-syllable lines (English), using three rhymes with one of these appearing four times and with the same rhyme for the fourth and fifth lines. The rhyme scheme was usually ababbcbc, and sometimes abbaacac. The huitain could be a stand alone poem, or used as a unit in longer poems. Sometimes multiple poets would each supply hutains to make a longer piece. It was most popular in the 15th – 16th centuries; in the 18th it was used for epigrams. There are those who think this French form is based on an older Spanish one[1].




[1] Travis Lyons: 219.

Sunday, April 10, 2016

The dog is intent

By THLaird Colyne Stewart, April AS 50 (2016)

The dog is intent
In the window sitting
Barks at those who trespass
As is only fitting

Our lives she protects
From our peaceful neighbours
Who daily go about
Toiling at labours

At the dog shouting
Never who will waver
In her mind a hero
The dog intent, savior.


This poem is written in breccbairdne which were Old Irish quatrains consisting of one 5-syllable line followed by three 6-syllable lines. They rhymed xaxa xbxb (and so on, where the x lines did not rhyme). All end words had two syllables. Poems written in breccbairdne concluded with dúnadh (when a poem began and ended on the same letter, word or syllable).



Thursday, April 7, 2016

Sing the song

By THLaird Colyne Stewart, April AS 50 (2016)

Sing the song,
Walk along,
In the throng,
In your hyrd.

Drink the mead,
Shout your deed,
State the creed,
Feel heart stirred.

Swing the sword,
Hit the board,
Earn reward,
Kill foe  king.

Swing the axe,
Pay blood tax,
Use thy saex,
Earn your ring.